Did you just have an interaction that didn't make sense? With someone illogical towards you and you didn't feel that recourse could have led to a positive conclusion? Come to our table.
We are philosophical detectives and vibe resetters. We are here to get to the bottom of things. We are for philosophical truth. We do not aim to mete out justice or repercussion. We simply are here to ascertain the truth.
Does your conversation need space and perspective? We want to hear! Our listeners are very dispassionate. We will show you the structure and then you can decide whether this is a service you could benefit from.
Most conversations happen by default, not by agreement. Someone starts talking, you respond, and before you know it you're deep in a discussion you never agreed to have, about topics you're not comfortable with, at a depth you didn't consent to.
Consensual conversation is different. It's dialogue where both parties have explicitly or implicitly agreed to:
Just as consent in physical interactions requires clear agreement, ongoing communication, and the ability to withdraw—so does consent in conversation.
You've experienced this: Someone corners you at an event and won't stop talking. A friend launches into a heavy topic when you're exhausted. A family member starts an argument you've had a hundred times before. Someone asks invasive questions and acts offended when you don't answer.
These conversations violate consent because:
Most people have been trained to be "polite"—which often means tolerating non-consensual conversation rather than establishing clear boundaries. The Consensual Conversation Table provides frameworks for doing better.
These principles form the foundation of all consensual conversation:
Both parties understand and agree to the conversation happening. This can be explicit ("Can we talk about X?") or implicit (responding positively to an opening). But agreement must exist.
What this looks like:
Agreeing to start a conversation doesn't mean agreeing to continue it indefinitely. Either party can pause, redirect, or end the conversation at any time.
What this looks like:
Both people understand why they're having this conversation. Are you venting and need empathy? Problem-solving? Sharing information? Debating ideas? Mismatched expectations destroy conversations.
What this looks like:
Both parties treat each other as equals worthy of respect, even—especially—when disagreeing. No manipulation, coercion, shaming, or social pressure to continue a conversation that's no longer working.
Anyone can leave a conversation at any time, for any reason, without penalty. If leaving carries social cost or punishment, consent has been violated.
Based on general consent principles, conversation consent must meet these conditions:
Consent is willing, positive cooperation in an act or the expression of a desire to engage in an activity.
For conversations, this means:
Here's how to bring consent into your actual conversations:
Don't just launch in. Check if the other person is available and willing:
Opening Phrases:
Notice these make it easy to say no. If someone feels they can't say no, consent doesn't exist.
State what you're hoping for from the conversation:
Don't assume ongoing consent. Check periodically:
Watch for nonverbal signs of discomfort: pulling away, checking phone, short answers, glazed look. These often signal withdrawn consent before words do.
When someone signals discomfort or says they need to stop:
Don't:
Do:
Don't let conversations trail off ambiguously. Ending well matters:
Recognizing these patterns helps you avoid them and respond when others use them:
Starting a heavy or difficult conversation without warning or agreement. "We need to talk" followed by launching into accusations or grievances.
Better approach: "I want to discuss [topic] because [reason]. When would be a good time for you?"
Continuing to talk despite clear signals the other person wants to leave. Blocking exits, following people, or creating social pressure to stay.
Better approach: Notice when someone is trying to leave. Let them go gracefully.
"Can I ask you something quick?" turns into a 45-minute intense discussion. Starting with one topic and pivoting to what you actually wanted to discuss.
Better approach: Be honest about what you're asking for from the beginning.
Making someone feel bad for setting boundaries. "I thought we were friends." "You never have time for me." "Fine, I won't bother you then."
Better approach: Respect boundaries without punishment. Address the relationship separately if needed.
Using social norms or politeness to force conversation. "Don't be rude." "Just hear me out." "You owe me this."
Better approach: Accept that no one owes you their attention or engagement, just as you owe no one yours.
When conversations go wrong or misunderstandings arise, the Consensual Conversation Table provides structured support:
The Consensual Conversation Table is useful when:
The Consensual Conversation Table does not:
A trained facilitator helps both parties:
Want to bring these practices into your relationships? Here's how:
Before trying to change how others communicate, practice on your end:
Others will often mirror your communication style without you saying anything.
Don't lecture people about consensual conversation. Instead:
"Hey, I've been trying to be more intentional about how I have conversations. I'm working on asking permission before launching into heavy topics and checking in more during discussions. You might notice me doing that with you."
This frames it as something you're working on, not something they're doing wrong.
Keep the simple definition handy to share:
Consent is willing, positive cooperation in an act or the expression of a desire to engage in an activity.
Most people understand consent in physical contexts. Extending it to conversation just requires drawing the parallel.
When someone tries to have a non-consensual conversation with you, demonstrate boundaries:
Most people have never seen healthy boundaries modeled. Showing them what it looks like is more powerful than explaining it.
Avoid accusing people of being "non-consensual" in their communication—that language carries heavy connotations. Instead:
Once you've mastered the basics, these skills deepen consensual dialogue:
Before difficult conversations, explicitly agree to ground rules:
Example:
"Before we start, can we agree that either of us can call a timeout if we need to? And that we'll both try to listen to understand rather than to argue?"
When a conversation isn't working, step back and talk about the conversation itself:
Problems in conversation often come from process (how you're talking) not content (what you're talking about). Learn to separate them:
Address process issues first. You can't resolve content disagreements if the process is broken.
Some conversations require more energy and attention than you have available. That's okay:
Honoring your limits creates better conversations than forcing your way through exhaustion or overwhelm.
Consensual conversation requires a shift from performative politeness to authentic boundaries. In the Network, we value:
It's better to decline a conversation you don't have bandwidth for than to half-engage and build resentment. Saying no respectfully is not rude—it's honest.
Hoping someone will pick up on subtle cues doesn't work. State your boundaries explicitly. "I need to stop here" is clearer and kinder than increasingly terse responses.
When conversations go badly, address it rather than pretending it didn't happen. "That conversation didn't go well. Can we talk about what happened?" Often resolves tensions that would otherwise fester.
Getting to the "right" answer matters less than having conversations where both people feel heard and respected. Focus on how you're talking, not just what conclusion you reach.
Consensual conversation isn't about being perfect. It's about being intentional. It's about treating dialogue as something that requires agreement, not something that just happens to you.
The Consensual Conversation Table exists to support this cultural shift—away from coercive communication patterns and toward voluntary, respectful exchange. Whether you use the formal Table service or simply bring these principles into your daily interactions, you're building a foundation for community based on genuine consent.
Start small. Ask permission before your next difficult conversation. Check in halfway through. End clearly. Notice how it changes the quality of connection.
Peaceful, strategic, and uncompromising.